<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elastic Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/</link>
	<description>Web standards, accessibility  and such like with a bias toward  Government web sites</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37049</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37049</guid>
		<description>RE Mogul, you could do with your own blog or micro-blogging (ie twitter or similar). It is a little difficult to follow your comments around this blog but I will try.

Bubblehead was the name given to a local music website create by Ang Chambers, some 15 years ago. It had some deep sea diver connotations, a lot of the music was centred round the port city of Fremantle.

You will find almost nothing in archive.org or the Pandora web archives on it. It lasted from 1994 to 2000 or so. My reviews of live band and photographs stopped during 1998/9, I just got burnt out from going to 3 gigs a week, processing film, developing photos and writing reviews as well as a full time job. Almost none of my work from 1994 to 99, still exists on the web, it was a long very time ago in web terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE Mogul, you could do with your own blog or micro-blogging (ie twitter or similar). It is a little difficult to follow your comments around this blog but I will try.</p>
<p>Bubblehead was the name given to a local music website create by Ang Chambers, some 15 years ago. It had some deep sea diver connotations, a lot of the music was centred round the port city of Fremantle.</p>
<p>You will find almost nothing in archive.org or the Pandora web archives on it. It lasted from 1994 to 2000 or so. My reviews of live band and photographs stopped during 1998/9, I just got burnt out from going to 3 gigs a week, processing film, developing photos and writing reviews as well as a full time job. Almost none of my work from 1994 to 99, still exists on the web, it was a long very time ago in web terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE Mogul</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37038</link>
		<dc:creator>RE Mogul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37038</guid>
		<description>Actually, a noun.


Copied From:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bubblehead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, a noun.</p>
<p>Copied From:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bubblehead" rel="nofollow">http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bubblehead</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE Mogul</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37037</link>
		<dc:creator>RE Mogul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37037</guid>
		<description>BUBBLEHEAD          adj. 

A person convinced that there is a real estate bubble and it is about to burst. Eagerly spouts off "wisdom" regarding this real estate bubble to anyone who will listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BUBBLEHEAD          adj. </p>
<p>A person convinced that there is a real estate bubble and it is about to burst. Eagerly spouts off &#8220;wisdom&#8221; regarding this real estate bubble to anyone who will listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE Mogul</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37036</link>
		<dc:creator>RE Mogul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37036</guid>
		<description>Photos are Surreal. Much Respect for Old School.


I'll try not to run-away with my comments. I really need my own blog (Sigh).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photos are Surreal. Much Respect for Old School.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try not to run-away with my comments. I really need my own blog (Sigh).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37022</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37022</guid>
		<description>Mogul I am old school 35mm photographer hence the 3:2 ratio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mogul I am old school 35mm photographer hence the 3:2 ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE Mogul</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37018</link>
		<dc:creator>RE Mogul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37018</guid>
		<description>Perhaps: All images a multiple of 1.6 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps: All images a multiple of 1.6 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE Mogul</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37017</link>
		<dc:creator>RE Mogul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37017</guid>
		<description>Why a multiple of 1.5?

An approximation of 1.6180339887 --The Golden Ratio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why a multiple of 1.5?</p>
<p>An approximation of 1.6180339887 &#8211;The Golden Ratio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE Mogul</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37016</link>
		<dc:creator>RE Mogul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37016</guid>
		<description>FLASH is the FUTURE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FLASH is the FUTURE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE Mogul</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37015</link>
		<dc:creator>RE Mogul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37015</guid>
		<description>Avoiding white is also future-friendly.

OLEDs and other advancing display technologies treat black/white smarter.

On an OLED display: a 1in x 1in image on an all-black background uses only as much battery as a 1in x 1in display (irrespective of the actual screen real-estate.) Darker pixels = lower power consumption, in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avoiding white is also future-friendly.</p>
<p>OLEDs and other advancing display technologies treat black/white smarter.</p>
<p>On an OLED display: a 1in x 1in image on an all-black background uses only as much battery as a 1in x 1in display (irrespective of the actual screen real-estate.) Darker pixels = lower power consumption, in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE Mogul</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37013</link>
		<dc:creator>RE Mogul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2005/elastic-images/#comment-37013</guid>
		<description>:::::About White Backgrounds::::::::::

White is for paper.
On screen, white = staring at a light bulb.

So many other hues, yet, so-little variety.
Respect the eyes -- people of the internet -- choose a color.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:::::About White Backgrounds::::::::::</p>
<p>White is for paper.<br />
On screen, white = staring at a light bulb.</p>
<p>So many other hues, yet, so-little variety.<br />
Respect the eyes &#8212; people of the internet &#8212; choose a color.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
