<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elastic fluid design - some notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickcowie.com/2006/elastic-fluid-design-some-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickcowie.com/2006/elastic-fluid-design-some-notes/</link>
	<description>Web standards, accessibility  and such like with a bias toward  Government web sites</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathanael</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2006/elastic-fluid-design-some-notes/#comment-5108</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2006/elastic-fluid-design-some-notes/#comment-5108</guid>
		<description>Nice proof of concept! It's great on my 1600x res screen cuz obviously the higher the resolution the more likely (unless you have massive 30" plasma screens) that fonts will be physically smaller - so makes sense that the higher the viewing resolution the larger the font should be to compensate - well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice proof of concept! It&#8217;s great on my 1600x res screen cuz obviously the higher the resolution the more likely (unless you have massive 30&#8243; plasma screens) that fonts will be physically smaller - so makes sense that the higher the viewing resolution the larger the font should be to compensate - well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
