People who visit this web site (some statistics)

Robert Nyman has pub­lished People who visit this web site (some stat­ist­ics) on his blog, so I thought I would do a quick com­par­ison with mine. In the­ory we write for the same audi­ence, so here are my stats for the past nine months.

Where people come from

Geo Location

No sur­prisesthat the US is num­ber one for both of us. Aus­tralia fea­tures very heav­ily in my stats more so that Sweden in Robert&#8217’s. The reason I would say is because I do tend to focus on local events and issues than Robert and attract more local vis­it­ors. If you remove the local vis­it­ors, the stat­ist­ics are sur­pris­ingly sim­ilar, the same coun­tries in almost the same order, with only slight vari­ations in percentages.

Platforms

platform version

I do have lar­ger per­cent­age of Mac vis­it­ors 17% com­pared to 13.5% and less Linux users 3% com­pared to 4% with Robert. How­ever, this is prob­ably the res­ult of the local bias, a big num­ber of the local web design­ers and developers I know and an even big­ger num­ber of the ones I meet at WD06 used Macs and these are people that reg­u­larly read my blog (or they mas­sage my ego and tell me they do).

Equally very few Aus­tralian web people, ie only me and one other I know use Linux out­side the server envir­on­ment.

Web browsers

Browser Version

Other than a few more Safari users as the res­ult of more Mac vis­it­ors, sur­pris­ingly sim­ilar res­ults. 52% Fire­fox to 32% Inter­net Explorer.

Robert believes that this is because Fire­fox is the browser of choice of the web standards-aware web developer. I tend to dis­agree, the big sur­prise for me in look­ing at my stats was that 50% of my web­site vis­it­ors come via google. I would expect my reg­u­lar read­ers to be heav­ily bias towards stand­ards com­pli­ant browsers, but people search­ing on hack­ing phpbb tem­plates. It would appear that more people are using fire­fox than just the web standards-aware web developer.

7 Responses to “People who visit this web site (some statistics)”

  1. Robert Nyman Says:

    Nick,

    Thanks for shar­ing! Always inter­est­ing to see someone else’s stat­ist­ics as well.
    Regard­ing Fire­fox: I’d rather say that it is very com­mon amongst web developers, but it has really caught on with other people as well. Since it’s my favor­ite web browser, it glad­dens me to see it. :-)

  2. Tuna Says:

    I don’t think (much that I would like it to be true) that Fire­fox has taken off at all out­side the techie and lead­ing edge adop­ters. Case in point 95% of my cli­ents have said, “What there is another browser?” They think that IE is all there is as it comes with the com­puter (win­dows, sorry mac folk) so it must be good. Some even think that the web is a product of the soft­ware (browser) and don’t ques­tion why they are using IE. They see it as — Its whats on the com­puter, it gets the job done, why change. Until browsers like FF get on the stand­ard PC OEM builds it will always be a mar­ginal. Sad but it’s reality.

    Need­less the stats are inter­est­ing. But they typ­ical of a tech blog.

  3. John Faulds Says:

    I was sur­prised on a recent hol­i­day to Fiji to find one inter­net cafe had set up all its PCs with Fire­fox. It’s the first time I’ve come across this situ­ation (been a while since I’ve been in an inter­net cafe in Oz) but it partly backs up your point that it’s not only tech­ies who are using it.

  4. nick Says:

    Gary, read the com­ments on Robert’s post and see that FF has moved bey­ond the techie and lead­ing edge adopters.

  5. Tuna Says:

    Read them before, I dis­agree, look­ing at the stats of all my cli­ents, FF is still sit­ting in the 10–15% mark. It’s still in the small mar­gins com­pared to IE 5/6 with 70% (10%,60%).

    The real mover from my view is the use of the Mac OS from 1–3% to 5–10%. This has all happened since OS X. That is the one that I think people should be look­ing at.

    Nick you should (if you a haven’t already) user track you Mac stats, see if you are get­ting the same IPs etc, this would help tell you who the users where.

    I love FF, and really hope and pray it will/can main­tain the momentum verses IE. But presently it seems only to woken Microsoft up and caused them to con­sider the issues that FF has addresses in its user inter­face and stand­ards com­pli­ance. It now remains to be seen if FF 3 can avoid becom­ing bloat­ware and still main­tain the core lead­ing fea­ture set. And what Microsoft have on offer with IE8 (I know their are people with a good idea on this already).

    Still it is all moot. If FF is not dis­trib­uted with the OS on a PC or Mac as the OEM bundle then the aver­age, non techie user is just not going to even be aware that it is present. The cor­por­ates are (in gen­eral) going to go with what is on the pre installed HD most of the time. This is where the mar­ket is, simple busi­ness reality.

    ..Much that I don’t like it..

    How­ever it’s still good to see FF high on vari­ous Blog sites etc. (Blog read­ing etc I still put in the techie and lead­ing edge adop­ters list till the RSS func­tion is in a com­mon browser and people know how to use it, i.e. IE 7) .

  6. nick Says:

    Gary, I would still say that FF has moved on from the browser of choice for bleed­ing edge (say the top 5% of inter­net users) to browser used by a size­able pro­por­tion of the lead­ing edge (the next 20 or 25% on inter­net users). The people who use the inter­net heav­ily, read blogs, use Web 2.0 apps, buy stuff reg­u­larly online, etc. Hence the high incid­ence of FF on some sites, includ­ing the 50% of vis­it­ors who come here from Google.

    The increase in Mac users is the ipod effect. People who bought ipods ended up being cross sold Apple computers.

    I have to admit the last gen­er­a­tion of ibooks and the mac­books are excel­lent value for money laptops, and I will be one of the four people in our office (out of a total of four staff) who will be buy­ing the next gen­er­a­tion macbooks.

  7. Tuna Says:

    Nick — Okay I will agree that FF has moved into the lead­ing edge adop­ters, but that is an easy to achieve out­come. They now have the hard slog, mov­ing into the con­ser­vat­ive mar­ket place. I would place heavy web use as being on the web for 3+ hours a day. Were as aver­age web usage (bank­ing, online pur­chas­ing, page read­ing) being around 1 or less hours a day. This is the mar­ket FF must make head roads into. Or the best they will do is around 20% for the total mar­ket share. It is possible.

    Have you tracked what people are com­ing from Google to your site to look at, as this will give you some indic­a­tion of the audi­ence. You see with your (total) num­bers it could still be the tech com­munity etc.

    Not sure on the ipod effect. Can’t see the trans­ition being that smooth.

    Agree on the latest round of mac­books etc, used to have an older iMac (pre intel) it was just too slow (and crashed a lot)… So I sold it. But look­ing at the new mac­books, it would fill a few needs here… think I need to go get me one!

Affiliates

Google
text advertising by
Powered by Reseller Zoom