<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML5 and mobile browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickcowie.com/2007/html5-and-mobile-browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickcowie.com/2007/html5-and-mobile-browsers/</link>
	<description>Web standards, accessibility  and such like with a bias toward  Government web sites</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ResearchWizard</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2007/html5-and-mobile-browsers/#comment-13086</link>
		<dc:creator>ResearchWizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 02:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2007/html5-and-mobile-browsers/#comment-13086</guid>
		<description>Opera mobile uses the same rendering core as Desktop Opera. Although it's usually a bit behind in version number (and therefor abilities) it does not use a special subset of XHTML.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera mobile uses the same rendering core as Desktop Opera. Although it&#8217;s usually a bit behind in version number (and therefor abilities) it does not use a special subset of XHTML.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai Hendry</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2007/html5-and-mobile-browsers/#comment-12827</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai Hendry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2007/html5-and-mobile-browsers/#comment-12827</guid>
		<description>I thought you might interested by my &lt;a href="http://natalian.org/archives/2007/05/26/mobile-web-3/" rel="nofollow"&gt;XHTML-MP and why you shouldn't care post&lt;/a&gt;.

XHTML-MP is so badly implemented on mobiles that I wouldn't trust those specs.

OMA makes up those specs so that their members with their crap UAs can
get away with murder.

Just stick to HTML4 strict and you'll be future proof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you might interested by my <a href="http://natalian.org/archives/2007/05/26/mobile-web-3/" rel="nofollow">XHTML-MP and why you shouldn&#8217;t care post</a>.</p>
<p>XHTML-MP is so badly implemented on mobiles that I wouldn&#8217;t trust those specs.</p>
<p>OMA makes up those specs so that their members with their crap UAs can<br />
get away with murder.</p>
<p>Just stick to HTML4 strict and you&#8217;ll be future proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2007/html5-and-mobile-browsers/#comment-12819</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 16:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2007/html5-and-mobile-browsers/#comment-12819</guid>
		<description>I'm looking to things like Opera's mobile browser and Safari-on-the-iPhone -- XHTML-MP will likely give way to full-on browsers such as these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking to things like Opera&#8217;s mobile browser and Safari-on-the-iPhone &#8212; XHTML-MP will likely give way to full-on browsers such as these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
