<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zooomr.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickcowie.com/2007/zooomrcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickcowie.com/2007/zooomrcom/</link>
	<description>Web standards, accessibility  and such like with a bias toward  Government web sites</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Cowie &#187; zooomr and flickr part 2</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2007/zooomrcom/#comment-9846</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Cowie &#187; zooomr and flickr part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 01:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/2007/zooomrcom/#comment-9846</guid>
		<description>In my previous post on zooomr, I mentioned there was a difference in the level of compression used by flickr and zooomr. I now know that is not the case, the difference is that if you upload a standard size (ie 1024px x 768px) to flickr, flickr will not reprocessed the image and will use the image as you uploaded it. So if you uploaded a 200k image at 1024px x 768px, the image available at the large size will be 200k &#8230;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my previous post on zooomr, I mentioned there was a difference in the level of compression used by flickr and zooomr. I now know that is not the case, the difference is that if you upload a standard size (ie 1024px x 768px) to flickr, flickr will not reprocessed the image and will use the image as you uploaded it. So if you uploaded a 200k image at 1024px x 768px, the image available at the large size will be 200k &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
