A funny thing happened on the way to Plurk

About six weeks ago, the Twit­ter fail­whale raised it’s ugly head and like many of my twit­ter friends headed off to look at altern­at­ives, the two new kids on the block that week where Plurk and Friend­Feed. Over 50 of my twit­ter friends joined both Plurk and FriendFeed.

Most of my twit­ter friends only had a brief encounter with Friend­Feed, before head­ing over to Plurk, where a few have become reg­u­lar users. From what I can gather most of my twit­ter friends found it dif­fi­cult to loc­ate their friends on Friend­Feed, this was before Bet­ter Friend­Feed recom­men­ded script appeared and you had to rely on the lim­ited tools avail­able on Friend­Feed of import­ing friends from Twit­ter with the same user­name. It was easier to get acc­quire friends from friends in Plurk than FriendFeed.

Instead I stuck round Friend­Feed, made use of the of the recom­men­ded friends which was pro­mot­ing A-list blog­ger and found some new friends, or rather inter­est­ing people who talked about sub­jects that inter­ested me.

So now I have two dis­tinct social net­works, Twit­ter based around people I know and have met, with a num­ber of friends of friends and few inter­est­ing people I have not met. Friend­Feed is mainly inter­est­ing people I have not met and a few friends from Twiiter who made the jump.

What have I learnt from this experience

If you are cre­at­ing a social network:

  1. Your best chance of keep­ing users past the ini­tial explor­a­tion phase, you need to make it easy to import your friends from other net­works and also make it easy to acquire friends from friends.
  2. If you can not do that, make sure they can find inter­est­ing people. Because a few people might stick around and might even bring a few people back
  3. If you are a user invest­ig­at­ing a new social net­work and can not find your usual friends, why not explore and find some inter­est­ing people, you might be sur­prised what the rewards will be.

Comments are closed.

Google