<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter, Plurk and FriendFeed as discussion tools.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickcowie.com/2008/twitter-plurk-and-friendfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickcowie.com/2008/twitter-plurk-and-friendfeed/</link>
	<description>Web standards, accessibility  and such like with a bias toward  Government web sites</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Cowie &#187; A quick history of conversation on the web</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2008/twitter-plurk-and-friendfeed/#comment-36946</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Cowie &#187; A quick history of conversation on the web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 06:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/?p=247#comment-36946</guid>
		<description>[...] got me thinking about my views I expressed in Twitter, Plurk and FriendFeed as discussion tools, and my experience with conversation on the web over time. So here is a potted history of my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] got me thinking about my views I expressed in Twitter, Plurk and FriendFeed as discussion tools, and my experience with conversation on the web over time. So here is a potted history of my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2008/twitter-plurk-and-friendfeed/#comment-36565</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/?p=247#comment-36565</guid>
		<description>Miles, Akismet is still running. So I wondering why those comments and few others snuck through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miles, Akismet is still running. So I wondering why those comments and few others snuck through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Burke</title>
		<link>http://nickcowie.com/2008/twitter-plurk-and-friendfeed/#comment-36521</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickcowie.com/?p=247#comment-36521</guid>
		<description>I agree withh the two comments above. :)

Maybe your changes have included removing spam comment filtering?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree withh the two comments above. :)</p>
<p>Maybe your changes have included removing spam comment filtering?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
