It is 2009 and some people still do not get accessibility

At the Gov2.0 taskforce road­show I ended up in con­ver­sa­tion with a rep­res­ent­at­ive of one Depart­ment bemoan­ing the fact the Gov­ern­ment will not give them extra money to make their web­sites WCAG 1.0 level 2 compliant.

I said it does not cost more to build a WCAG 1.0 level 2 com­pli­ant web­site if your developer knows what they where doing. The two developers sit­ting either side of us ( one state gov­ern­ment and one private enter­prise) agreed, yet this per­son kept say­ing it costs more money.

The private enter­prise developer then asked why don’t you include the require­ment for WCAG 1.0 level 2 com­pli­ance in their web­site tender. The response it is too expens­ive. Asked if they ever tried, no it is too expens­ive was the response.

It is not 2000, when Maguire vs SOCOG decision was new and fresh and under­stand­ing of web­site access­ib­il­ity amongst developers was lim­ited. For the past 10 years, Aus­trali­ans web­site developers and Gov­ern­ment Agen­cies have known the Dis­ab­il­ity Dis­crim­in­a­tion Act applies to web­sites. If you can not build a WCAG 1.0 level 2 com­pli­ant web­site in 2009, you do not need extra money to fix it, you need to look at web­site busi­ness prac­tices and bring them into the 21st century.

Comments are closed.

Google